I agree with your good analysis of the Chinese broken. But what I still don’t understand is that the article is about breaking SPN, whether the referred paper is about factoring RSA. It seems to me that they have mixed the recent paper about RSA with some more older papers about using quantum advantage on the rectangle attack. What do you think?
Honestly, I have no idea. I think this just demonstrates the shallowness of the reporting and the importance of common sense when interpreting bold claims.
I agree with your good analysis of the Chinese broken. But what I still don’t understand is that the article is about breaking SPN, whether the referred paper is about factoring RSA. It seems to me that they have mixed the recent paper about RSA with some more older papers about using quantum advantage on the rectangle attack. What do you think?
Honestly, I have no idea. I think this just demonstrates the shallowness of the reporting and the importance of common sense when interpreting bold claims.